<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ending with a bang</title>
	<link>http://blog.hallwaytrack.org/articles/2006/05/16/ending-with-a-bang</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Conference Organization</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nils Magnus</title>
		<link>http://blog.hallwaytrack.org/articles/2006/05/16/ending-with-a-bang#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hallwaytrack.org/articles/2006/05/16/ending-with-a-bang#comment-3</guid>
					<description>There are pros and cons for a wrap-up session. I think it depends on the size of the event. For conferences with a limited number of parallel tracks this may be suitable, however, if you have several tracks and a unsynchronized schedule, there is the chance of very few people showing up. So if you plan a wrap-up, think of some real news for the attendees and spread that word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are pros and cons for a wrap-up session. I think it depends on the size of the event. For conferences with a limited number of parallel tracks this may be suitable, however, if you have several tracks and a unsynchronized schedule, there is the chance of very few people showing up. So if you plan a wrap-up, think of some real news for the attendees and spread that word.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
